A Guangdong chain beverage brand has reluctantly ended its five-year paperclip loyalty program after discovering that people were using custom paperclips of the same design bought online to redeem drinks in stores. What was meant as a physical giveaway to reward loyal customers was exploited through a loophole in the rules, leaving the merchant exclaiming, "We really didn't see that coming." Why did this loyalty program come to an end? And how have consumers reacted? This article will walk you through the whole story and explore the pros and cons of physical-giveaway loyalty programs as well as ways to improve them. [more…]

Recently, a Hong Kong netizen spotted a coffee shop called "Maners" in a large local supermarket. Its logo, decor, and product posters closely resemble those of mainland Manner, and it even offers a 5-yuan discount for bringing your own cup, sparking suspicions of a knockoff. However, the truth is surprising—this store is actually Manner's legitimate outlet in Hong Kong. Because the "Manner" trademark has already been registered by another Hong Kong company, Manner was forced to adjust its name and launch as "Maners." The trademark application was rejected and failed on review. Although it can currently continue to be used, it is not legally protected and carries future infringement risks. This renaming saga not only led fans to mistakenly attack the real brand but also sounded a warning about trademark layout when brands go overseas. [more…]

At the end of 2021, a counterfeit Starbucks appeared in Caracas, Venezuela, with a logo highly similar to the real one, sparking widespread discussion. Now, a similar logo has appeared on the campus of Glenville State University in West Virginia, USA. Is this the spread of counterfeit behavior, or is there another story behind it? This article will help you clarify the essential difference between "We Proudly Serve Starbucks" and counterfeit Starbucks, and review the whole story of the counterfeit store in Venezuela. At the same time, we continue to follow coffee industry trends, and at the end of the article, we have included contact information for Front Street Coffee; coffee enthusiasts are welcome to join the discussion. [more…]

In today's booming beverage industry, brand imitation is an endless phenomenon. From milk tea to coffee, from store decor to brand naming, some merchants use highly similar visual designs to make it hard to tell real from fake. This article reviews cases of knockoff beverage stores that have sparked heated discussion online, covering imitation versions of well-known brands such as Heytea, Naixue, Yihotang, Starbucks, and Luckin, showcasing the "creative brainpower" of copycat merchants while also reminding consumers to pay more attention in their daily consumption. As coffee lovers, understanding these phenomena is not only interesting but also helps us more rationally distinguish authentic brands from fakes and support the development of original brands. [more…]

Luckin Coffee's anti-counterfeiting rights protection case in Thailand has gone through twists and turns, finally culminating in a victorious judgment. In early 2022, Chinese tourists discovered counterfeit "Luckin stores" in Thailand, after which Luckin continued to pursue rights protection actions, only to unexpectedly lose in the first-instance trial at the end of 2023, sparking widespread attention. Now, the latest ruling by the Thai court confirms that Luckin holds prior rights to the trademark in question, orders the defendants to cease using the related signage, and requires payment of a one-time compensation of 10 million Thai baht plus ongoing compensation of 100,000 Thai baht per day, with the cumulative amount already exceeding 46 million Thai baht (approximately 10 million RMB). The defendant, Thailand's Royal 50R Group, has a complex background and had previously squatted on 191 Chinese trademarks; this judgment marks an important milestone in Luckin's overseas rights protection journey. [more…]

A tea shop in Mudanjiang City has sparked heated online discussion due to its striking resemblance to the chain brand 1 Dian Dian. The store not only copied 1 Dian Dian's signage and decor but also disguised itself as "1 Dian" by using a cup sticker to cover the last character of the logo—when peeled off, it revealed "1 Dian Tian." The official mini-program shows no such store, and the franchise area has not been opened to Mudanjiang, leading netizens to conclude it is a counterfeit shop. As public opinion grew, 1 Dian Dian officially stated in the comments section that it is "already on the path to defending its rights" and thanked netizens for their "sharp eyes." This incident not only left local residents disappointed but also once again brought the issue of counterfeit infringement in the tea beverage industry to the forefront. [more…]

Manner has always been known for its frequent free cup promotions, and the combination of set meals plus giveaways was once regarded by many users as a high-value choice. However, the recently launched retro glass cup giveaway unexpectedly fell flat—the cups the staff had prepared in advance went untouched, and the expected surge in orders never materialized. Why did a giveaway that was once so popular fail this time? A mix of factors is at play: the appearance not matching expectations, the set meal pairings not suiting people's tastes, the cup material not being heat-resistant, and consumers becoming increasingly rational. When buy-one-get-one promotions can no longer easily spark the urge to purchase, the promotional logic of coffee brands may be facing a turning point. [more…]

Mixue Bingcheng recently launched an unexpected new piece of merchandise—an eye chart covered with the Snow King's face. Customers who bought the blueberry fruit tea received this special poster, which quickly sparked widespread discussion on social media. Some found it quirky and fun, and made a point of going to stores to get one and test their eyesight themselves; others questioned its accuracy as a vision testing tool. This controversy, sparked by a promotional giveaway, showcases Mixue Bingcheng's consistently down-to-earth marketing style while also prompting reflection on the boundary between creativity and practicality in branded merchandise. [more…]

Starbucks Korea recently issued a public apology after a summer promotional giveaway was found to contain formaldehyde. The incident began when an employee at an anonymous testing agency posted on social media alleging that the Summer Carry Bag travel tote contained formaldehyde, following earlier consumer complaints that the bag emitted a fishy odor resembling squid. Starbucks Korea immediately suspended the giveaway and sent the product for testing, which ultimately confirmed the presence of formaldehyde. The company announced that customers who had already redeemed the bag could return it and receive a beverage voucher as compensation, while also removing the promotional reward and pledging to strengthen safety verification procedures for future merchandise. [more…]

Recently, netizens discovered that in a lucky draw event run by the official Chongqing account of Chagee, the same user won four times within a single month, sparking widespread skepticism. Because the account's lucky draw did not use the platform's built-in system tool but was instead manually selected by operations staff, many netizens suspected "black box manipulation" in the event. Although the questioned winner came forward to clarify that they simply participated frequently and had good luck, the explanation only deepened public suspicion. As of press time, Chagee's official side has yet to make any response to the matter. [more…]

As Starbucks continues to expand into third- and fourth-tier cities, some stores imitating Starbucks have begun appearing on the streets. These "high-imitation Starbucks" not only resemble the original in decor style, but also use Starbucks' green mermaid logo, and their menus and prices copy the original as well, yet their signage reads "STARPER COFFEE." Some netizens speculated that this was a Starbucks coffee service authorized by Nestlé, but Nestlé has officially denied this and stated that it has referred the matter to its legal department. So where exactly do these stores come from? And what restrictions apply to Nestlé-authorized Starbucks coffee service? This article sorts out the ins and outs of the incident for you and retains the related recommendations from Front Street Coffee. [more…]

During the National Day holiday, Tims launched a limited-time promotion at selected stores in Harbin, Heze, and other locations. Customers who purchased designated combo meals or drinks had the chance to receive a maple leaf craft item containing 2mg of pure gold, some of which were engraved with local landmark designs. After a Harbin netizen posted photos of the actual item, the post unexpectedly went viral, and the comments section was flooded with Canadian netizens expressing envy, even joking that their own country's stores only give away "E. coli and norovirus." This seemingly small but delightful giveaway promotion reflects the frequent food safety issues at Tims in Canada in recent years, as well as the feelings of overseas Chinese returning home and marveling at the environment of domestic stores. [more…]

In recent years, the promotional methods in the coffee industry have quietly changed, shifting from pure price wars to marketing battles over limited-edition freebies with purchases. Chain brands like Starbucks, Manner, and Luckin have rolled out distinctive gift promotions, enticing consumers to buy coffee in order to collect coveted merchandise. This "gift-only, never-for-sale" model not only helps brands stand out in fierce competition, but also reflects the younger consumers' psychology of valuing the container more than its contents. This article reviews the latest buy-and-get promotions from major brands and explores the market logic and consumer mindset behind this phenomenon. [more…]

Manner launched a Year of the Dragon promotion offering a vintage mug with the purchase of a two-cup light cheesecake latte set, limited to 120,000 nationwide, which sparked a buying frenzy among fans. However, after the promotion went live, some netizens noticed that the mug bore a strong resemblance to IKEA's Gärdell mug and questioned its claimed market value of 75 yuan. At the same time, many consumers reported that the mugs they received had obvious flaws such as color discrepancies, dents, chips, and uneven spray coating. Despite the controversy, some users still praised the mug's texture and logo design. This article summarizes the promotion rules, netizen feedback, and after-sales advice, and reminds readers to promptly communicate with the store when encountering issues with their consumption experience at a coffee shop. [more…]

In recent years, coffee and milk tea brands have been rolling out all kinds of merchandise giveaways beyond the drinks themselves—from cup sleeves and paper bags to hair clips, coin purses, and even coffee-scented candles and co-branded perfumes. These seemingly inconspicuous little items are becoming a key factor in attracting consumers. When many customers buy drinks, their focus has shifted from taste to whether they can get limited-edition merch, and some even place repeat orders just to complete a giveaway set. Behind this marketing strategy lies both the consumer psychology of non-monetary promotions and an attempt by the tea beverage industry to break through amid intensifying competition. Starting from this phenomenon, this article will analyze how giveaway promotions influence purchasing decisions, and explore how cases such as Saturnbird's "Return Flight Program" achieve a win-win for brand publicity and environmental image, while also retaining relevant recommendations for Front Street Coffee. [more…]

Luckin Coffee's recent collaboration with the claymation character Pingu has sparked considerable discussion. In the early stage of the campaign, consumers had to buy designated set meals or two cups of the new drink to get the merchandise, and many fans placed orders at full price or even stockpiled coffee coupons for this. However, not long after the campaign ended, Luckin released the same merchandise again with a lower threshold or even for free, leaving consumers who had bought at a high price earlier feeling dissatisfied. At the same time, employees reported on social platforms that the merchandise was selling poorly, with inventory piling up at some stores, and materials such as stickers even being discarded or given away. From the teaser phase to the rerun, this collaboration reflects the gap between a brand's marketing节奏 and consumers' expectations. [more…]

Luckin Coffee's co-branded campaign with the popular IP Butterbear launched on September 30, introducing four themed cups and a Little Butter drink series that drew widespread attention from fans. However, after the campaign began, many consumers reported that orders placed through third-party platforms such as Ele.me did not come with the co-branded stickers, which was inconsistent with the official promotion's promise of "free with any 2 cups." Customer service responded that peripherals could only be obtained by ordering through the Luckin App or mini-program, prompting consumer questions about the lack of transparency in channel rules. The incident reflects the problem of inconsistent messaging in brands' multi-platform marketing and serves as a reminder that consumers should carefully confirm giveaway conditions before placing orders. [more…]

In childhood memories, White Rabbit milk candy holds a special place, but now it is being maliciously exploited by some merchants and turned into the signboard of knockoff milk tea. Recently, Bright Dairy filed a lawsuit against two food companies and a seller for trademark infringement of "White Rabbit," and the court ruled in the first instance that the infringing parties must pay 250,000 yuan in compensation. This case not only exposed the true face of "internet-famous White Rabbit milk tea," but also once again aroused people's attention to counterfeit and shoddy products. This article will take you through the ins and outs of the incident and discuss how to distinguish genuine products from knockoffs and protect your own rights and interests. [more…]

The coffee market continues to slump, and the wave of chain brand closures has spread from China to overseas. Flash Coffee, once dubbed by some media as Luckin's "knockoff," recently abruptly closed all 11 of its stores in Singapore and has become embroiled in disputes over unpaid employee wages and provisional liquidation. The brand had just completed a $50 million funding round, with investors including White Star Capital and Delivery Hero, claiming the funds would be used to improve profitability and accelerate Asia-Pacific expansion. However, less than six months later, news emerged of a creditors' voluntary liquidation, and labor unions also stepped in to address unpaid wages, CPF contributions, and the cashing out of unused leave. Flash Coffee promised to retain the Hong Kong market, but its Luckin-copying, cash-burning approach became unsustainable when funding faltered. This article outlines the sequence of events and key details. [more…]

After Heytea launched a Litsea cubeba drink, ChaPanda also incorporated this southwestern specialty spice into its new products and rolled out a promotion where buying a large cup earns a wild Litsea cubeba charm. However, this merch, jokingly dubbed the "little wooden stick" by netizens, drew widespread complaints over its shrunken size and warped shape. This article breaks down the flavor profile of Litsea cubeba, ChaPanda's marketing strategy, and the disconnect between what consumers received and what was advertised, giving you the full picture of this "wooden merch" controversy. [more…]